Appeal details
Counselvise Citation
[2017] 131 COUNSELVISE.COM (IDT) 26892 (CESTAT-NA)
Assessee PAN
Bench
Appeal Number
Appellant
Respondent
Appeal Type
Others
Pronouncement Date
03-07-2017
Assessment Year
misc
Judgement Text
" IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL/CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5296 OF 2003 SUPERINTENDENT OF CUSTOMS, GUJARAT ....APPELLANT(S) VERSUS NEMICHAND(DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 874 OF 2003 A.C. PATEL ....APPELLANT(S) VERSUS PREM PRATAP SINGH SISODIA AND ORS. ....RESPONDENT(S) O R D E R Heard. We do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. The appeals are, accordingly, dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. .......................J. [ADARSH KUMAR GOEL] NEW DELHI ......................J. 3RD JULY, 2017 [UDAY UMESH LALIT] Digitally signed by MADHU BALA Date: 2017.07.08 10:55:44 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified REVISED ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.12 SECTION II-C S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IA 15215/2008,16395/2008, in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).7416/2008 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 25-01-2008 in CRLA (MD)No. 712/1999 passed by the High court of madras) SUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL EXCISE CUSTOMS Petitioner(s) VERSUS PREM PRATAP SINGH SISODIA @ PREM SINGH SISODIA @ PREM PRATAP SISODIA & ANR Respondent(s) (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 15215/2008 FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 16395/2008) WITH C.A. No. 5296/2003 (IV-A) Crl.A. No. 874/2003 (II-B) SLP(Crl) No. 6002/2009 (II-C) (For stay application on IA 13572/2009) SLP(Crl) No. 6005/2009 (II-C) (For stay application on IA 13574/2009) Date : 03-07-2017 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Mr. K. Radakrishnan,Sr.Adv. Mr. Arijit Prasad,Adv. Ms. Sushma Manchanda,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR Mr. Shreekant N. Terdal, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Hemantika Wahi, AOR Ms. Jesal Wahi,Adv. Ms. Puja Singh,Adv. Ms. Shodhika Sharma,Adv. ...2/- -2- Mr. Abhinav Agrawal,Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(Crl)NO.7416/2008, SLP(CRL)NO.6002/2009 AND SLP(CRL.)NO.6005/2009 Heard. Delay condoned. We do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. The special leave petitions are, accordingly, dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5296/2003 AND CRL.A.NO.874 OF 2003 Heard. The appeals are dismissed in terms of the signed order. (MADHU BALA) (VEENA KHERA) COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (Signed order is placed on the file) ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.12 SECTION II-C S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IA 15215/2008,16395/2008, in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).7416/2008 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 25-01-2008 in CRLA (MD)No. 712/1999 passed by the High court of madras) SUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL EXCISE CUSTOMS Petitioner(s) VERSUS PREM PRATAP SINGH SISODIA @ PREM SINGH SISODIA @ PREM PRATAP SISODIA & ANR Respondent(s) (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 15215/2008 FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 16395/2008) WITH C.A. No. 5296/2003 (IV-A) Crl.A. No. 874/2003 (II-B) SLP(Crl) No. 6002/2009 (II-C) (For stay application on IA 13572/2009) SLP(Crl) No. 6005/2009 (II-C) (For stay application on IA 13574/2009) Date : 03-07-2017 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Mr. K. Radakrishnan,Sr.Adv. Mr. Arijit Prasad,Adv. Ms. Sushma Manchanda,Adv. Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR Mr. Shreekant N. Terdal, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Hemantika Wahi, AOR Ms. Jesal Wahi,Adv. Ms. Puja Singh,Adv. Ms. Shodhika Sharma,Adv. Mr. Abhinav Agrawal,Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Delay condoned. We do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. The special leave petitions are, accordingly, dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (MADHU BALA) (VEENA KHERA) COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR "
AI Insights
The case involves two separate appeals: a civil appeal by the Superintendent of Customs, Gujarat, and a criminal appeal by A.C. Patel, both against various respondents including Prem Pratap Singh Sisodia and others. The appeals were heard together due to their related legal issues. The Supreme Court, after considering the arguments and the relevant legal provisions, concluded that there were no sufficient grounds to overturn the decisions made by the lower courts. Consequently, both appeals were dismissed, and any pending applications were also disposed of.
